![medal of honor 2010 game movie medal of honor 2010 game movie](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tnSRdTV0n0k/maxresdefault.jpg)
While none of the game modes will wow anyone looking for innovation, Danger Close did double Warfighter’s class system, giving each a special ability to draw from in combat. The multiplayer, thankfully, is quite a bit more fleshed out and enjoyable. The military-focused side of the story fares little better, as the bulk of those cutscenes involve watching the back of a man’s head as he uses his computer and exchanges copious amounts of unexplained military jargon to unseen characters over the phone. Further, the poorly-rendered CGI cutscenes somehow manage to wind up looking far worse than the in-game visuals. Unfortunately, the script is on the level of a Lifetime Original Movie, and the characters barely register as human beings, let alone people with complex emotional lives. The game seems to realize that you’ve seen all this before, and thus introduces a subplot involving the failing marriage of Preacher, one of its lead characters. You’ll wind up effecting hostage rescues and sniping Somali pirates without any clue as to how those objectives have anything to do with the global terror plot you’re supposedly focused on. The story takes a while to cohere, and features a number of early-game missions that appear to have only tenuous connections to Warfighter’s main plotline. Medal of Honor 2010 was purchased from a gaming store with our own funds.Using some of the same characters from its predecessor, Warfighter spins another tale of hard men doing hard tasks while speaking tersely and sporting only the grizzliest of beards. If you're hard-up for a modern shooter, then it might not be that bad, but as a game on its own it's a waste of money. It's not creative, it's not realistic, it's not imaginative, and it's not innovative. Overall, MoH is only worth it in the sense that it's a decent shooter. The graphics and sounds are so generic that even if they were rendered really well, they'd still be boring. Its attempt to be realistic means that there's no creative input in the game (it's the same guns and vehicles found in every other shooter), but the fact that it's so unrealistic means that this decision makes no sense. Both of these things were already done better in CoD4. Multiplayer mode has a rudimentary experience system to unlock new guns/accessories, and kill-streak rewards like mortar support. What's worse, almost everything in this game was done better by Call of Duty 4, which was released a few years ago.
![medal of honor 2010 game movie medal of honor 2010 game movie](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/q9NHPcNMPac/maxresdefault.jpg)
Everything is distinctly uninspired the storyline attempts to depict realistic situations like taking out Taliban anti-aircraft guns, but the gameplay is so unrealistic and clunky that it's a ridiculous attempt. Your character, like in many shooters, has regenerating health, so gunfights are a string of "shoot a guy, hide behind cover, shoot a different guy, repeat". There's the usual assortment of "real weapons" - assault rifles, shotguns, sniper rifles, and so on. The gameplay itself is the FPS standard that gaming has delivered hundreds of times over. The story itself is largely unimportant - there's a plot, but mainly the game is jumping between different soldiers, including a Delta Force sniper and an Army Ranger. This approach continues with the new Medal of Honor game: the objectives and story are low-key things like raiding enemy hideouts and securing meeting points, but the actual gameplay is totally over-the-top and unrealistic.
#Medal of honor 2010 game movie series#
Taking place in modern times, MoH follows in Call of Duty's footsteps a few years too late.Īs WW2 franchises go, "Medal of Honor" was always a series to ignore realism in favor of a more "action movie" approach, but strangely tried to pretend like it was serious. "Medal of Honor" is a reboot of the WW2 series of games of the same name.